Define the point the process uses
A tool center point, or TCP, describes the working reference attached to a robot tool. It may represent a welding tip, dispensing nozzle, gripper reference, or another process point. Universal Robots’ TCP documentation defines its TCP with position and orientation relative to the tool flange. Your controller’s exact configuration method and coordinate convention must be confirmed in its manual.
For the buyer, the main issue is accountability. A robot arrives with mechanical dimensions, but the installed tool, adapter, and process reference belong to the finished cell. The quote should state who establishes those values, verifies them, documents them, and restores them after a replacement.
Keep tool, robot, and fixture calibration distinct
Changing the TCP is not the same as correcting the robot’s kinematic model or locating a fixture in the cell. These references interact, so a production error should not automatically be treated as a TCP problem. Ask for a drawing that identifies the robot base, tool flange, tool reference, workpiece frame, and any camera frame.
Use our accuracy and repeatability guide to separate inconsistent returns from a consistent offset. If the part sits differently each cycle, editing the tool reference can hide one observation without correcting the fixture. Require the integrator to preserve baseline settings and diagnose the source before applying offsets.
Specify the method and its evidence
Follow the robot and tool manufacturers’ supported calibration procedures. RoboDK’s tool-calibration documentation describes reference-point and reference-plane methods using different tool orientations. The appropriate procedure depends on the tool geometry and application; this guide is not a substitute for supervised controller training.
For a FAIRINO installation, request the controller-version-specific procedure and compare it with the FAIRINO coordinate-system and tool-calibration documentation. Do not assume that a menu name or optional automatic-calibration feature is identical across firmware versions. Put the required fixtures, probes, reference artifacts, and training into the delivery scope.
Verify using an independent task
After setting the TCP, ask the integrator to check it using positions and orientations that represent production. Repeating only the same setup used to calculate the reference can give a narrow view of performance. Document the acceptance method, instrument, conditions, and limits appropriate to the process.
Consider a hypothetical dispensing application where a nozzle must approach several faces of a part. The trial should cover those faces, the selected standoff, the required orientation changes, and the actual tooling stack. A correct-looking coordinate entry is not the acceptance result. The measured process outcome is what matters, together with a clear record of how it was obtained.
Treat every tool change as a configuration change
Assign each physical tool a durable identifier and a matching program record. Include TCP position and orientation, payload information, applicable recipes, and inspection history. Replacing a finger, nozzle, adapter, or tool plate may change the process reference. Define which changes require verification and who is qualified to perform it.
Our tool-changer selection guide covers the mechanical and utility side. For automatic changes, require confirmation that the correct tool is present and that its corresponding settings are active before the process resumes. For manual changes, provide a straightforward work instruction with an approval step proportionate to the application.
Ask for a maintainable calibration record
| Record | Reason to retain it |
|---|---|
| Tool and adapter identifiers | Connect the settings to the installed hardware |
| Method, date, and responsible person | Make verification traceable |
| Values, units, and coordinate convention | Prevent ambiguous restoration |
| Verification results and limits | Show the application passed its agreed check |
| Backup and recheck procedure | Support recovery after maintenance |
Include calibration deliverables in a consultation about your cell. They are easy to overlook when comparing arm prices, yet they determine whether the maintenance team can restore the process confidently. Buy a repeatable procedure and usable records, not merely a one-time set of numbers.
Include tool setup in your FAIRINO cell scope
A FAIRINO purchase should include a practical plan for the installed tool reference, not only the arm and controller. Bring the proposed gripper, adapters, working point, and changeover method so we can scope configuration and verification with the integrator. Use the FAIRINO selection guide and model comparison to connect tooling requirements with candidate arms. Request a FAIRINO quote that identifies calibration deliverables, training, and the checks needed to restore production after tool maintenance.
Sources and further reading
Find the FAIRINO robot for your application
Share your part weight, working area, and production target. Request a FAIRINO model recommendation and discuss a quote for your project.
Request a FAIRINO quote