Robotic tray loading and unloading can make a machine-tending project easier by presenting parts at known locations. The tray becomes part of the automation equipment, however, and deserves the same scrutiny as the robot. Pocket geometry, location repeatability, wear, and operator loading habits determine whether a grid of programmed positions remains usable in production.

Choose how the cell locates the tray

Define a physical locating scheme that controls the tray's position and orientation. Decide which surfaces locate it, which features clamp it, and how the cell confirms that it is seated. Avoid relying on a cart wheel position or a painted floor outline when the gripper needs a consistent relationship to small pockets.

For a movable cart, distinguish the cart docking tolerance from the tray locating tolerance. A locating feature close to the pockets may be more useful than an accurate dock far away on a flexible frame. Ask the integrator to show the complete tolerance path from robot base to tray datum to pocket to part.

Universal Robots' palletizing template also supports repeated tray and fixture positions. This is an example of available programming structure, not confirmation that a mechanically inconsistent tray can be corrected by a grid routine. Our repeatability and accuracy guide explains why the entire positioning chain matters.

Design pockets around the pick

Provide enough contact to locate the part without blocking the fingers or vacuum tool. Check whether the part can rock, nest against a neighbor, or stick to the pocket when lifted. Include raw-stock burrs, oily surfaces, dimensional variation, and finished-part features in the trial. A pocket that works for the blank may not suit the machined part.

Build a sample tray section before committing to a full rack. Test its center and edge pockets, because support and access may differ. Include the longest intended fingers and the neighboring parts at their maximum dimensions. Use the gripper-finger design checklist to review engagement depth, approach clearance, and the release path.

OnRobot's machine-tending range includes parallel and centric gripping arrangements. Choose the arrangement by the surfaces available on your part. Ask whether one tool can handle both raw and finished conditions, and whether a dual-tool arrangement leaves enough clearance inside the tray and machine.

Make empty and occupied positions explicit

Decide how the system knows which pockets contain usable stock and which are available for finished parts. A fixed count is convenient only if the loading procedure enforces it. If partially loaded trays are allowed, specify presence detection, operator confirmation, or a verified occupancy map. Clearly distinguish a skipped pocket from a completed part.

Haas's cobot operation documentation separates table-grid settings, stock dimensions, and gripper configuration. Use that separation in your own specification: the tray recipe, part recipe, and tooling setup should agree before motion begins. These documented Haas controls are an example, not instructions for a FAIRINO controller.

ConditionProposed response to validate
Expected stock pocket is emptySkip only under the approved recipe policy and log the shortage
Finished-part pocket is occupiedPrevent placement and request an identified recovery
Tray is not seatedPrevent the automatic sequence from starting
Wrong tray type is loadedReject the recipe and tray mismatch
Part pickup is uncertainUse the validated verification and recovery sequence

Calculate real autonomy

In a hypothetical cell, a tray holding twenty-four blanks and a complete production cycle of three minutes provides seventy-two minutes of stock. That does not prove seventy-two unattended minutes. The finished tray may fill sooner, an inspection may be due, or consumables and chip management may require attention. List every resource that can end the automatic run and use the shortest supported interval.

Include tray exchange in production timing. Ask whether exchange requires a machine stop, whether a second station can be replenished under the validated design, and how the controller recognizes a new tray without erasing unfinished work. The machine-tending business case shows how attention intervals affect expected labor benefit.

Accept the tray system with the cell

Specify tray material, cleaning method, replacement tolerances, spare quantities, and ownership of the drawings. Test multiple manufactured trays and repeated removals, not one carefully tuned fixture. Verify operator loading instructions and approved recovery under representative production conditions.

Plan a FAIRINO tray-handling cell

FAIRINO is a candidate for tray-fed work when the selected model can handle the part, tooling, and full pocket-to-machine path. Start with the FAIRINO payload and reach comparison, then review the actual gripper approach, tray locations, and machine clearance. To keep the investment focused, price the tray subsystem and robot integration together. Request a FAIRINO tray-handling quote with sample trays, raw and finished parts, pocket drawings, and the attention interval you need between replenishments.

Sources and further reading

Find the FAIRINO robot for your application

Share your part weight, working area, and production target. Request a FAIRINO model recommendation and discuss a quote for your project.

Request a FAIRINO quote